Mark @MarkKado

@joeroganhq That’s a friggen dinosaur 🦖

@RyanMcbeth @Awesome_Jew_ @TheAdamKingShow @TuckerCarlson Love this guy!

@DatHandsomeJerk @Chopsyturvey I was going to say, is that girl going to blink? She sounds like an AI reading a script and doesn’t take a breath. Then I realized.. yeah, it’s AI

@TipOfTheBanana I just added it to my shopping list, thanks TOTB!

Thank you for your perspective. It’s a reasonable argument and it has merit. But hurting people’s feelings doesn’t mean the deal was a loss for the US. Next administration will fix the relationships and the deal will live on with no end date. Again, hate him or love him, Trump gets things done for the US. (At the cost of Europe and everyone else). Hopefully this will incentivize Europe to get their act together and arm up so they can defend their sovereignty and not be bullied around like this.

In Islam it’s allowed to Lie in warfare. The Iranians were masters of deception. Their nuclear program had uranium enriched far beyond civilian purposes. Why? They were months away from nuclear level enrichment. Sure they are still taking pot shots at the US, with one or two missiles they managed to do out of the rubble. To what success? Can you argue with the fact that the bulk of their missile arsenal and missile manufacturing capability was decimated? I didn’t think so.

@GloOouD Comparisons like this are just stupid and non-productive. It’s like showing an image of Hitler with a dog and you with a dog, comparing you to hitler because you both owned dogs and like dogs. Really low level IQ stuff here.

@GloOouD You Realize the US country animal is the bald eagle right? It’s everywhere in the US. On our currency, on all of our national institutions, etc. have you ever seen a US speach? Take a look at the sigil on the “seal of the US”. That’s right. It’s a big eagle.

I’m sorry you feel that way. But if you look at what the US had before and what US has now in regards to Greenland access, it is significant. And what did it cost the US? Nothing. Say what you will about trumps tactics, that was a win for the US. If you disagree, please explain how it wasn’t.

Putin’s SMO is imperialistic in nature and driven by a desire to grow his empire. The US actions in Iran were aimed at 1) preventing Iranian nuclear armament (mostly achieved) and 2) preventing build up of ballistic missile stockpile and eliminate missile production (achieved). This has been consistent since the beginning and has not changed.

I like some of the things Trump does and dislike some things he does. I would assume trying to portray lack of bias is valuable for folks in your position as well. When it comes to European friendships and politics regarding Greenland. Didn’t Trump just secure essentially unlimited military rights to Greenland? That’s a huge win for the US at essentially no cost and no expiration date. Folks, don’t underestimate how important that is for US security. Regarding the emboldened Europeans and new dislike for trump. (Honestly I also agree this was handled very poorly by Trump but I will play the devils advocate here). It’s about time the Europeans got emboldened. They criticize the US for being the global hegemon and then come begging the US to handle all the global security actions. European countries have allowed their militaries to fall into disrepair, mismanagement, underfunding, and overall lack of preparedness. If it means hurting the relationships with EU countries for them to secure their own borders and fund their own militaries, one can argue Tump achieved a big win there. Correct? Furthermore, support for Ukraine. I also agree with you his actions and rhetoric is bad on this front. But again, being the devils advocate; Ukraine is not a US ally. Europe should have been the major funder of support for Ukraine this whole time, not the US. It’s not the US’s place to hold up Ukraine, it’s Europe’s. The US has done far more than it’s fair share. Europe needs to step up, and as a result of Trump’s actions, Europe did start to step up. Again, love him or hate him, Trump has achieved a huge amount of wins for the US. No, he’s not perfect, far from it. But it’s strategically illiterate to say he’s failed on all the fronts you mentioned above.

@Clement_molin, I typically agree with most of your assessments. However i don’t know why you say “the war he launched on Iran is a total failure”. Do you really stand by that? What did he claim the purpose of the conflict was? Did he achieve the goal(s)? You are such a great analyst this seems very unlike you.

@gummibear737 Is he cross eyed?

@Osinttechnical It’s a Bird, It’s a plane, it’s a …. Wait… that’s a Ukrainian Fire Point FP-1 Drone!

Interesting perspective Klavan has. It’s certainly a birds-eye view of the situation. In reality, we are on the tail end of a “good time” can all agree hard times are ahead. Good men will be produced in said hard time. But will they succeed under the onslaught of evil in this world? Forced divide us from within and without. For virtue to succeed, good men must combine else they will all fall one at a time.

I typically agree with all your assessments, but I don’t think Elon Musk wants a Russian victory. That’s a silly proposition. This week he just liked a post from the ex Ukrainian Defence minister that said Elon has been one of the biggest contributors to Ukraine’s ability to defend against Russia. You’re a highly intelligent individual and I’m very surprised at the anti-Elon view in regards to the war in Ukraine. He’s been very helpful to Ukraine. Russia is a tiny market, Elon doesn’t give a damn about it if I had to guess.

@thewebbie You can hire me to go with you and do the speaking for you. Kind of like a Moses / Aaron kind of deal. I do public speaking all the time.

@bayraktar_1love I’m shocked at how crisp the footage is. They certainly fixed the latency issues (likely via repeaters and starlink). Im sure this has had a big impact on drone efficacy.

@bayraktar_1love Wow, some expert flying right there! Insanely good drone pilots

@RyanMcbeth @NavyVet @RealJakeBroe @prestonstew_ Tucker is a nut case. Dentist much preferred.