Censorship Watch UK @OfcomCommentary

@wesstreeting @SecWar No LGBTQ flag? Embarrassing non-entity.

🇪🇺 Europe regulates 🙁 🇺🇸 America innovates 😁 Writer: Michael

This is the Realpolitik Europe needs.

The Economist @TheEconomist

2 days ago

Ukraine has “already lost” the war against Russia, says @Alice_Weidel, co-leader of the Alternative for Germany party, which is leading German opinion polls. She told @zannymb, that Germany should pull the plug on support for Ukraine against Vladimir Putin’s invasion. Watch the

2K 1K 8K 1.4M 2K

@TheEconomist B

@ArchRose90 It never ends well for the censors.

Labour: Ban porn showing incest. ✅ Ban cousin marriages in the UK. ❌ Real incest but no looking at fake incest. 🥴

European bureaucrats are already panicking over how they're going to regulate this.

Tesla @Tesla

a day ago

Real life, baby

18K 93K 750K 88.8M 87K

@RaheemKassam Who made you the UK Patriot-in-chief from Washington DC?

🔥 BREAKING: Elon Musk just unveiled a new Tesla Roadster that can LITERALLY FLY using SpaceX thrusters, and has SO MUCH DOWNFORCE that you can drive UPSIDE DOWN This will be the best handling car EVER PRODUCED by FAR. And keep in mind, this is a literal PRODCTION CAR that you can BUY. Absolutely INSANE. James Bond-level stuff! Congrats @elonmusk!

🚨Should teachers be FIRED for honestly answering a student's question? That's what happened to Anita Meston, a Christian teacher who said she was pro-life when asked by a student. @TalkTV 👇

"The UK, EU, Australia, the Russian Federation… everyone offshore wants a piece of the First Amendment. This is one of hundreds of unconstitutional orders, from all over the globe, that have been transmitted into the United States in the last 18 months." prestonbyrne.com/2026/10/14/dem…

Wow, wow, wow. I just left the National Press Club where Minister of Communications @AnikaWells spoke. She repeatedly and brazenly lied about the fake accounts, claiming they were only for enforcement, even though the legislation says in black and white that the eSafety Commissioner can use them in unlimited ways for "educational" and "promotional" purposes. One big moment came when a Politico reporter got up and said something about how mean people like @PaulineHansonOz were to eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant. Seriously. A supposed reporter was white-knighting for a government official during the official Q&A. The same reporter had come up to me before Wells' speech and asked if I had criticized Inman-Grant. Who needs government censors when you have Politico? After he asked his question, Wells showed the most emotion, describing online criticism of Inman-Grant as "abuse." She also talked about her own staff's supposed suffering. I kid you not. The mask dropped, and you could see what really upset her: people — including a sitting Senator — criticizing government officials. After gaslighting the audience about fake accounts, Wells repeatedly insisted the government wasn't trying to censor content. She said this after filling her speech with examples of content she claimed harmed people. You couldn't make it up. This legislation is the culmination of decades of progressives equating words with physical violence. Wells cynically compared her legislation to prevent psychological "harm" to various laws that protect people from physical harm, like seat belt laws. BTW, Wells never said what content it was that she thought caused eating disorders. Pictures of skinny women? Dietary advice? Who knows. Nobody asked. Another important moment came when Wells explicitly said Australia would be pursuing censorship alongside other nations, including the UK, France, and Spain—all countries where governments risk losing power to populists. I spoke with Julie Inman-Grant before the speech began and asked about the fake accounts. She insisted they were there just for enforcement, and when I asked why the law allowed them to be used for government propaganda, she said she might write an "enforcement memo," which, of course, would have no impact on the legislation. After her speech, I went up to Wells and asked if she was seriously saying the legislation didn't allow the government to use fake accounts for government propaganda. She refused to answer. A man who said he was from the National Press Club stepped in front of me and said I could interview her afterward. But that wasn't possible because they rushed her out the back to avoid any difficult questions. So there you have it. The pettiest people in Australia are seeking to silence citizens and their political opponents in the name of protecting children. These deeply intolerant and cynical people want to control what you can see and say online. And they're doing it with most of the media's support. Australia has reached a new low in its rapid descent into dogmatism, intolerance, and censorship.

Michael Shellenberger @shellenberger

3 days ago

The government today will introduce sweeping censorship that @AlboMP & @AnikaWells lie about. Below she claims the government wants to create a bot army of fake accounts for “research” when the bill clearly intends for them to be used in partisan warfare against fooled citizens.

104 1K 4K 355K 234

Cavemen Issues Dire Warning That The Wheel Is Going To Eliminate Countless Jobs

@GadSaad @IlhanMN In any other self-respecting country should would serve jail time before deportation.

THIS IS WHERE WE SEND OUR KILLERS, DRUG DEALERS & THUGS.   THIS IS WHY MURDER AND OTHER CRIMES IN AMERICA ARE AT RECORD LOWS.

🚨 BREAKING: Ilhan Omar’s staff officially CHANGED HER “BIRTHDATE” in public records in 2019, which could be a reason DHS RAIDED Omar's DC house this week, per NYP The 1-year age change is the difference between her being a LEGAL CITIZEN or not. Omar's ORIGINAL birthdate and place was listed in the official Minnesota record as Oct. 4, 1981 in Somalia for ALL the years she was in the Minnesota House. She never challenged it. She was publicly CLAIMING a birthdate of 1982, so a political opponent accused her of LYING about her age--as her birth year was listed as 1981--so staffers then CHANGED it to Oct. 4, 1982 The reason this is important is because if her ACTUAL birthdate is Oct. 4, 1981, that'd mean she would've been INELIGIBLE to legally become a US citizen in 2000. An easy case for de-naturalization, as under the immigration rules applicable in 2000, a child generally needed to be under 18 at the time a parent naturalized (and meet other conditions such as lawful permanent residence and residing with the parent) to automatically derive citizenship. An 18- or 19-year-old would NOT qualify under that minor-child pathway and would instead need to naturalize INDEPENDENTLY as an adult. So if the feds can prove she LIED about her age on her naturalization documents, and she was actually an adult, it's likely OVER for her. She'll be going back to Somalia 🔥 🎥 @TMZ’s @jacob_wass (May 2026)

@SBarrettBar We must stop accepting media messaging that these are "u-turns". These are lies pure and simple.

BAD GIRL, BAD GIRL, what you gonna do when they come for you? 😂 @IlhanMN you laughed and celebrated when the FBI raided President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump’s home . But now that you’re the one getting raided, suddenly you want to cry and play the victim? In my opinion, you are a Somalian scammer, you are a fraud, and you are one of the most corrupt politicians in America! You had no sympathy for President Trump, so don’t expect everyone to suddenly have sympathy for you. You are not above the law Ilhan Omar

Meine lieben deutschen Nachbarn, bitte unterzeichnet den @SaveEuropeAct. Deutschland verdient es, geschützt zu werden, es verdient es geschätzt, und gerettet zu werden! Schließt euch der ersten patriotischen Bewegung für einheimische Europäer an! Save-europe-act.com

Save Europe Act @SaveEuropeAct

5 days ago

🛡️Shield Tour in Dresden, Germany! 🇩🇪 The remigration banner is raised by many volunteers and supporters together with national organisers Jan @heimat3cho and @max_maerkl. In the heart of Dresden, we make our voices heard: SEND THEM BACK! ✈️

34 348 2K 80K 30

Well Humza, how do you reconcile child marriage, wife beating, clitorectomies and stoning women...with traditional English values Do you see a compromise ? Child marriage is OK if the girl is over ten, perhaps ? A meeting point, half way ? Stoning women only with pieces of wood ? Removing only half the clitoris ? Let's have some suggestions, please, Humza

Humza Yousaf @HumzaYousaf

5 days ago

Debate Islam all you want. Perfectly legitimate. That's not what you're doing. You're asserting that Muslims are not compatible with life in Britain and therefore do not belong here. That isn't debate, that is lighting the fuse and hoping others will throw the molotov cocktail.

4K 411 3K 1.0M 156