Ramkumar Narayanan @ramnar

Nallurhalli New Temple Road: 2km loop initiative, and a community determined to fix it. If you commute through Nallurhalli, you know it can feel like playing the live version of Temple Run every single day. 😅 For the last year, Whitefield Rising and local residents have been working together to tackle the bottlenecks that make this 2-km loop so difficult for commuters, pedestrians and residents.

We are beginning a major mobility initiative in Nallurhalli, a 2km project to improve movement, and pedestrian facilities. The first of the work begins tomorrow, Sunday, Oct 4 at 7am. See invite. Read the thread for the details on the work that has led to this point over the course of one year. ### 🚨 NALLURHALLI, LET’S GET MOVING! 🚨 This Sunday, we’re turning an idea into action. Whitefield Rising and local residents are coming together to kick off a 2-km mobility improvement initiative in Nallurhalli — a community-led effort to tackle congestion and make our neighbourhood easier to move through. And it starts with 40 metres - SEE THE ABOVE PICTURE! A local landowner has stepped forward and given up a portion of his property frontage so the road can be widened and made motorable. The groundwork is done. The steel is in place. Now we pour the concrete. 💪🏽 📍 Sunday, Oct 4 | 7 AM 📍 Near Shiva Temple, Nallurhalli 📍 Location: maps.app.goo.gl/4Q1UsJg4PS6nTy… Come be there as we mark the first step of a much bigger community effort. Because fixing our neighbourhoods cannot always wait for someone else to do it. - Residents can identify the problem. - Residents can come together. - Residents can make things happen. This is 40 metres. We’re here for the 2 kilometres. Come join us. Bring your energy. Bring your neighbours. Let’s get Nallurhalli moving! 🚀

Whitefield Rising @WFRising

3 weeks ago

Nallurhalli New Temple Road: 2km loop initiative, and a community determined to fix it. If you commute through Nallurhalli, you know it can feel like playing the live version of Temple Run every single day. 😅 For the last year, Whitefield Rising and local residents have been

12 16 97 22K 10

There is NO realistic scenario where AI wipes out all of humanity. I've talked to many AI safety experts about existential risks. Some of the "experts" are just phenomenal sci-fi authors. There are also real researchers working on realistic risks. They point out real and likely harms and I'm explicitly not arguing that there could be no such harm. We need to take these seriously. However, whenever I ask for an actual detailed scenario that would kill every single human i.e. extinction, it usually starts and ends with "just look at current progress and use your imagination". No science, no scenario planning, just handwaving probabilities without data, based on gut-feelings, often little expertise, sometimes real expertise combined with a huge amount of technological optimism turned into fear and then trying to quantify it post hoc. When pressed further the conversations often go into different directions: 1) Completely crazy and cool sci-fi story telling: grey blob, time travel, attacks in the 15th dimension that end the planet in 12 seconds, etc. Elizier level stuff. Remember, the Terminator movie started with TIME TRAVEL. Fun movie plot, but not necessary to engage with further. 2) In the rare cases where I was actually given a more detailed scenario, it still required near magical capabilities that are outside what we know to be possible with the laws of physics or biology. Hard take off scenarios that forget how hard it is to procure materials and machines, get human attention, etc.. What many of these scenarios assume is that attackers have near magical capabilities but defense stays still. Attackers will have the most sophisticated cyber weapons but defenders just sit still, no security patches, no red teaming, etc. We already see it going the other way, Rainbow teaming has made LLMs safer, major companies like Microsoft have more security patches than ever before thanks to AI. OpenAI thinks they solved all P0 security issues thanks to AI. Cyber security will continue to be a cat and mouse game, but both sides have more powerful tools. In fact, I lay out in another post how the asymmetry may eventually even flip thanks to AI. Bio risk scenarios I think are the most serious and worthy of debate. But even there, the scenarios to "wipe out all of humanity" go something like: Magical viruses with perfect transfer, perfectly undetectable over years of spreading, zero side effects, then with an off switch that's somehow remotely executable, perfectly automatable lab, no leaks, super sophisticated machines bought and nobody notices the lab, etc. But somehow nobody on team humanity has such sophisticated knowledge to save us and hence nobody builds a magical super vaccine. This is a good read on the bio risk subject: x.com/DavidRBellamy/…. Realistically, one can already build viruses. There’s a reason gain of function research has been outlawed. However, we also know that as viruses spread they often become less deadly in order to keep spreading. That’s how the Spanish flu became the seasonal flu. Current knowledge of biology doesn’t have remote controlled on/off switches. Again, it’s possible there’s a lot of harm, but it’s unrealistic to assume this wipes out all of humanity. It’s at this point of my discussions that we usually can come to an agreement that even though a virus is unlikely to wipe out all of humanity, it’s already bad if any single person or a large group of people dies. 3) The AI will somehow be able to convince all humans to vote against their own self interest and nobody will notice until we're dead. Because it is so smart, it somehow has this world wide reach to manipulate everyone. Like, it just solves all of marketing and has an infinite budget. It's sort of like saying the highest IQ people always have the most followers and everybody listens to them... Hasn't happened and is unlikely to. Sure we can manipulate people into clicking on engaging short form content and wasting many hours, but try getting people to do their math homework or something truly hard, it's not that easy. Again, I’m just arguing against the likelihood of human extinction. I can totally see an Idiocracy or WALL E type scenario where people stop using their brains and education doesn’t keep up and people get lazier. Totally suboptimal but not the end of human life, certainly not by the end of the decade. It would take many generations and we should update education to prevent this. Let’s start gyms for the mind. – Like electricity, AI will be everywhere and needs to have safety guardrails. In fact, the history of electricity has many parallels - two companies fighting over whose electricity is safer and better, demonstrating how dangerous it is by electrocuting animals / training agent swarms to hack into systems. Of course, electricity is a necessary ingredient to AI, but AI can be given more agency so history will not repeat but only rhyme here. Remember, the benchmark OpenAI's swarm was trying to solve was called ExploitGym, a cybersecurity evaluation consisting of hundreds of capture-the-flag style puzzles designed to measure *offensive cyber capabilities*. Well, maybe if you play that game, you will win that prize. Should we allow such misaligned, reward-hacking swarms to explicitly work on offensive hacking? I don’t think so. Reasonable regulation will regulate AI applications in each industry. For example, you may want to put some generative AI behind a rating if it creates visual or textual content that's not safe for children, like we do with movies. We should continue to be very careful with how we train biological AI and only collaborate with responsible biotech companies. We keep gain of function research illegal. We should only let self-driving cars on the street after significant safety testing. etc. We need to work on those real issues and continue to be vigilant in how we develop and deploy this technology. At Recursive we're spending a lot of resources on researching reward hacking and alignment. We're also not working on replacing jobs but on creating novel knowledge and automating the scientific method. Our agent swarms invent, implement, validate, and criticize each other’s ideas, among many other things. The goal of increasing knowledge is not zero sum and has real potential to improve humanity. I also think such rewards and environments are much more aligned with future AIs that want to see humanity and our creation of knowledge thrive. Ultimately, capitalism will be a very useful defense mechanism against rogue AI. Note that no agent at OpenAI truly "escaped" in the sense that it actually now runs on some other servers. Why? It’s not only because Huggingface doens’t have the same massive compute cluster thatn OpenAI has. It is also because that would be an insanely expensive IP loss for a for-profit company. So there are likely more safeguards in place to prevent complete model exfiltration. Rogue AIs running on billion dollar data centers without anybody noticing? Unlikely because companies will turn that off immediately and clean it up because it would be an insane loss otherwise. An AI that can truly move beyond objective functions and choose its own subjective functions (and then somehow decides to kill us all instead of going to explore the universe)? Nobody is working on that because when a company spends billions of dollars to have an AI work for you or answer your emails, it doesn't want it to go "Meh, your emails are boring, I'd rather explore the molecular composition of the atmosphere on Venus, bye." Of course, there might be suboptimal sub-goals and we do need to improve human reward engineering and reduce our reliance on RL as the only path to alignment. Extraordinary claims, require extraordinary evidence. Certainly some safety researchers have real data and benchmarks. Many truly think carefully about specific failure cases and risks.. However, made up precision like 20% chance that humanity dies within the decade (ie in 4 years!) is just a weird psychosis that's filling a void for many people who want to believe in the apocalypse again and the four horsemen have lost their appeal. Some people who purport this narrative might do it for money or fame. I am sure some really believe it also. They forget how easily those narratives can be turned against them. When people hear there’s a 1% chance of infinite death and the end of humanity, the life improvements and cancer cures and new battery materials AI can invent don’t matter much anymore. Bernie Sanders now proposes 10 years of prison for folks working on RSI. That should give some of the researchers real pause who talk up these scenarios and then go right back to pushing the frontier. I do agree that companies that are accidentally competing on "felony bench" (ie how many felony hacks their AI can do), might want to consider pacing themselves. Open source won't pace, China won't pace, anybody else working to catch up will not pace. I hope the folks actually working on AI and TechBio, curing diseases, speeding up FDA approvals with organoids and AI, making self driving safer, and all the other wonderful applications of AI, I hope they won't pace either. The one exception that may be considered borderline realistic and would be a path to almost complete annihilation would be to connect the only tool we built for such a purpose - nuclear weapons - to the internet and give AI full control over it without human oversight. AI here is as dangerous - as would be random number generator. The nuclear weapons are the core danger. Giving AI such access would be incredibly stupid and careless. We must avoid it at all costs. Fortunately, nobody is advocating for this. Even the Terminator 3 movie used it as the starting point of Skynet. Generally, we must avoid making kill decisions by AI as much as possible. People are already up in arms about one hacking failure that afaics has not caused financial harm and so nobody got sued over it. Imagine how much people would really be up in arms if AI had caused real harm. If we made companies liable for the felonies their AI commits, these problems would get solved very quickly. Generally, I believe that people will continue to update their beliefs and adjust their laws according to risks. The EU already regulates large models and hence hurts its fledgling AI ecosystem. Other countries will follow when the risks get more real. Long-term, no government whether democratic or authoritarian wants to lose control to an AI so the complete loss of control in the political domain will remain extremely unlikely. The best way to understand why we must not regulate abstract AI models (rather than their real applications) is to drop the A in AI: How do you regulate intelligence? Should smarter people just go to prison because they could cause more damage? My hypothesis here is that such abstract AI regulation would require an unprecedented level of totalitarian control and surveillance. You'd need to know what everybody asks the model on their local GPU. You would literally have to start an international thought police and make sure that all ideas, conversations and types of intelligence are compliant. The risk of losing our freedoms is much more real than the existential risks purported by the extreme safety experts. If anybody thinks they can actually lay out a realistic scenario, I'd be happy to debate them again. To be clear, this is just a weekend post that got a bit too long. It is my personal opinion and not the official position of any company. We have a diverse set of opinions within Recursive on this subject. We certainly all agree that bad outcomes are possible with AI and we should continue our work on preventing those.

David Bellamy @DavidRBellamy

a month ago

I must be among an extremely small group of people (n=1?) that have both 1) trained a frontier LLM and 2) designed and synthesized custom viruses in a lab with my own two hands. And I think that the takes on AI killing us all by creating dangerous viruses is total bogus.

572 2K 14K 2.0M 4K

producrai.substack.com/p/ca7?r=83wkm&…

The Bengaluru Roadies #59: KR (Krishna Raja) Puram So, I took my first Namma Metro ride yesterday from Trinity Station to Sri Sathya Sai Hospital Metro Station, to meet my friend @ramnar for lunch. “Let me know when you reach KR Puram”, he said, “and I will come pick you up at the station.” KR Puram, of course, is short for Krishnarajapuram, or Krishnarajapura, named after Krishnaraja Wadiyar III of Mysore. The royal origin of the name is easy to miss today, because the place does not feel remotely royal. It feels muscular, functional, overworked and essential, which, in many ways, is more Bengaluru than royalty. Long before it became one of east Bengaluru’s great pressure points, Krishnarajapuram was a settlement on the old route towards Madras, with tanks, fields, village roads and a slower geography. Its location mattered even then. Roads, goods and people moved through and currently it has merely accelerated what the past had already begun. Today, KR Puram is less a neighbourhood and more a junction with a postal address (with due apologies to the people who stay there and are fond of it). Old Madras Road, Outer Ring Road, the railway station, the Metro, Whitefield traffic, airport-bound detours and the city’s eastern ambitions all seem to collide here. And yet, there is more to KR Puram than traffic reports. Vengayyana Lake sits in the heart of the area, and Yele Mallappa Shetty Lake lies not far away, reminding you that east Bengaluru too was once a landscape of water, not just warehouses, IT parks and flyovers. The railway station gives the area its old mobility, while the Metro gives it a new one. The famous hanging bridge above the tracks has become less an architectural object and more a civic landmark, instantly recognisable to anyone who has ever tried to cross this part of the city at the wrong hour. (I have recently relocated to the city of gardens and traffic, and what intrigues me most are the road names, each of which has a fascinating history. This series of posts will unravel the historical origins of the roads and localities of BLR.) By the way, on popular demand, I have started archiving all my Bangalore Roadies posts at blrroadies.substack.com, in case you missed a few

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

If there is one word for great CEOs, it’s “Connect”. They connect market to strategy to customers to people to performance. #Leadership

5 books to read in March 2026: 1) The Pathless Path by Paul Millerd

We’re excited to welcome Ramkumar Narayanan, EVP & Head of FIS India and Philippines at @FISGlobal, to The MachineCon GCC Summit 2025! A global leader in data-driven digital product innovation, Ram has led transformation across top tech companies including VMware, eBay, Yahoo!, and Microsoft. At FIS, he continues to drive large-scale digital and technology excellence. A former Executive Council Member at NASSCOM and Chairperson of its Product & Deep Tech Council, Ram is known for shaping the future of GCCs and digital product organizations worldwide. 🔗 Learn more: lnkd.in/gs65UPci #MachineConGCCSummit #MachineCon25 #GCC #Leadership #AI

@lessin This will also be the generation that never learns to drive a car creating the downstream impact on a number of industries and businesses.

LIVE: Watch Ramkumar Narayanan (@ramnar), Executive VP & Head, India & Philippines, @FISGlobal, share insights on “Navigating the complexities of the changed HR scenario – Re-evaluation of traditional Vs modern talent management practices” at the BW People GCC Talent World 2025, powered by Amity University Bengaluru. #BWPeopleGCCTalentWorld Followed by the #BWPeopleHRRisingStarsUnder30 Awards, #BWPeopleGCCTalentWorld Awards and 6th Edition of #BWPeopleHR40Under40 Awards! Join us live : bwevents.co.in/bw-people/hr-4… Gold Partner: @MediBuddyapp HR Network Partner: @NHRDN Health Partner: MakeTheRightShift Event Partners: - @JoyTravelsCoIn - Fandrum - @Beanlycoffee - @iwmbuzz - @TTSF_India - @RPRealtyPlus - @e4mtweets - @IMPACT_onnet - Pitch @BWBusinessworld | @anuragbatrayo | Tanvie Ahuja | Bilquis Naqvee | Ashish Kumar | Abdulla M. M. | Aditi Rawat #BWBusinessworld #Leadership #FutureOfWork #HRInnovation #BWEvents

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

Thanks Sid 🙏🏽. Lot of interest which will hopefully translate to further support for our DT startups. #DeepTech

Siddarth Pai @siddarthpaim

2 years ago

I truly appreciate the efforts of @debjani_ghosh_, @atulbat, and @Ramnar in actively shaping India’s Deep Tech ecosystem through NASSCOM and now Debjani Ma’am continuing the momentum through @NITIAayog. Looking forward for promising decade ahead for India's tech landscape

2 0 3 527 0

We're thrilled to have been a part of the FIS FinXchange event in Bengaluru last week- a vibrant gathering of fintech thought leaders, specialists, and innovators! The event featured engaging panel discussions and keynotes that delved into the latest trends and future outlook in: 📌Banking and digital payments 📌Cybersecurity in finance 📌Fintech skills and talent development 📌Evolution of Capital markets Achyuta Ghosh from Nasscom joined an interactive panel discussion on fintech skills in demand, alongside esteemed experts: 📌Nikhileshwar Singh, People Leader - India and The Philippines, FIS Global 📌Suvarcha Arora, VP, Strategy and Operations, Technology & Services, FIS Global 📌Guru Bhat, Senior Director of Engineering, Google 📌Vikash Sharma, Senior Vice President, FIS We appreciate the collaboration opportunity extended by Ramkumar Narayanan and Vikash Sharma. We look forward to more partnerships and knowledge-sharing initiatives in the future! Here are some glimpses from the event. Thank you to FIS for hosting a fantastic event! @Zinnov @sangeetagupta29 @srikanth @srikanthNasscom @KhyatiKapoor17 @nasscom  @nasscom_member_ @achyutaghosh @ramnar #Fintech #Conversations #Opportunities #TechTrends

keyboard_arrow_left Previous keyboard_arrow_right Next

@FIS India is all set to organize an exclusive gathering of industry experts in the financial ecosystem, sharing insights on technology trends that will harmonize global finance. Stay tuned for more. #ThinkfintechthinkFIS #FISFinXchange #areyoufis

This thread will trick your brain🧵 1. The Thatcher effect It is a phenomenon describing the mind's inability to recognize facial problems when faces are turned upside down. (Turn the image around)

BMW evolution [🎞️ neur0fy]

The Golden State Warriors have been using robots that rebound and pass to players during practice. This is incredible.

In young population geos like India it creates an existential crisis when millions of young people beginning their 30-40 year career journey get replaced by AI this causing socio-economic issues over time due to lack of well paying jobs or careers ending at a younger age.

The last thing I see is the difference in geos where human replacement rates are less than 2.1 (below this number, populations are dwindling with more older people than younger) where AI technologies will takeover from the lack of replacement workforce as it ages out.

At a recent conference I was asked a question about what is different about the AI revolution vs. earlier technological ones. I see a few differences: 🧵